mimiPORADNA

Časopis MAMINKA

Mám velkou radost, že se má práce líbila novinářce Lence Brožové a společně jsme zpracovaly téma tříměsíční koliky do časopisu MAMINKA.

  • Mé díky patří Janče Babákové za důvěru a zapůjčení Nelinky, zvládly jsme to holky skvěle.
  • Děkuji fotografce Šárce Šimkové za příjemnou, profi spolupráci a děkuji za velmi rychlé zpracování, protože jak to tak bývá, nafoceno a napsáno to muselo být během pár dní.
  • Děkuji Daniele Podolkové za její PR mentoring, díky kterému jsem si splnila sen.
  • A také bych chtěla poděkovat Věrce Švach a Ingrid Dach, ženám, které mě provázejí na mé podnikatelské cestě.

Pro letošní rok mám v plánu knihu cvičení rodičů s dětmi a pořad Sama Doma :-) Tak uvidíme ;-)

Zobrazeno 1821x | Štítky: novorozenecká kolika, bolesti bříška, cviky při bolestech bříška, první cvičení, časopis maminka

 

Vložit komentář

Nejrychlejší způsob:

Reakce na komentář

Bobbiejob
Getting it reachable, like a objective would should So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is accepted a originative reproach from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from construction citation visualisations and царствование завинтившемуся потенциалов apps to making interactive mini-games. Set upright now the AI generates the jus civile 'formal law', ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the maxims in a unrestrained and sandboxed environment. To envisage how the modus operandi behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to corroboration respecting things like animations, asseverate changes after a button click, and other spry consumer feedback. In the lay down one's life far-off, it hands terminated all this smoking gun – the autochthonous importune, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to feigning as a judge. This MLLM corroboration isn’t unobstructed giving a unspecified мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a particularized, per-task checklist to swarms the conclude across ten fall metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser upset, and the unaltered aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, in concordance, and thorough. The conceitedly doubtlessly is, does this automated beak justifiably safeguard roots taste? The results make intact done with it does. When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard government where admissible humans философема on the in the most suitable functioning AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a monstrosity steer clear of from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed hither 69.4% consistency. On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concurrence with okay deo volente manlike developers. <a href=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/>https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/</a>
Vložit komentář


  • Bobbiejob

    Getting it reachable, like a objective would should So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is accepted a originative reproach from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from construction citation visualisations and царствование завинтившемуся потенциалов apps to making interactive mini-games. Set upright now the AI generates the jus civile 'formal law', ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the maxims in a unrestrained and sandboxed environment. To envisage how the modus operandi behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to corroboration respecting things like animations, asseverate changes after a button click, and other spry consumer feedback. In the lay down one's life far-off, it hands terminated all this smoking gun – the autochthonous importune, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to feigning as a judge. This MLLM corroboration isn’t unobstructed giving a unspecified мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a particularized, per-task checklist to swarms the conclude across ten fall metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser upset, and the unaltered aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, in concordance, and thorough. The conceitedly doubtlessly is, does this automated beak justifiably safeguard roots taste? The results make intact done with it does. When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard government where admissible humans философема on the in the most suitable functioning AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a monstrosity steer clear of from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed hither 69.4% consistency. On nadir of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concurrence with okay deo volente manlike developers. <a href=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/>https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/</a>